In quite a lot of Belgian chessclubs you can find teachers able to explain a number of steps of the steps method. Unfortunately it doesn't go beyond that. A more advanced coaching is only accessible for a handful of players, e.g. those getting a special invitation to join the project go for grandmaster. The majority and particularly adults are completely left alone after the steps method.
Naturally top-players fulfill for those less fortune ones an unsolicited exemplary function. In my article fashion I already showed how a particular opening suddenly becomes very popular after a top-player started to insert it in his repertoire. If an opening holds against players of +2700 elo than it will certainly be against a much more modest level. That sounds pretty logical but it is too simplistic to believe that this will guarantee success. Every opening has its own characteristics and we don't have all the same style of playing chess.
So the danger exists that we play an opening for which we neither have the knowledge nor the skills. This aspect we also see in the middlegame. A top-player plays a risky concept but apparently wins with ease.
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
Move
N
Result
Elo
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Please, wait...
1.e4c52.Nf3d63.Bb5+Nd74.0-0Ngf65.Re1a66.Bd3b57.c4g5(This very aggressive move was already discussed 2 years ago on chesspub by the Australian grandmaster David Smerdon but Magnus did not know. It is not the first time that Magnus is not fully up to date of the existing publications, remember his debacle of a few years ago against Luke Mc Shane.)8.Nxg5Ne59.Be2bxc410.Na3Rg811.Nxc4Nxc412.d4Nb613.Bh5Nxh514.Qxh5Rg715.Nxh7Qd716.dxc5dxc517.e5Qc618.f3Qg619.Nf6+Kd820.Qxg6Rxg621.Ne4Bb722.h4Rc823.h5Rg824.Bd2Nc425.Bc3Bh626.Rad1+Ke827.Rd3Bf428.Nf2Bc629.Nh3Bg330.Re2Bb531.Rd1Bc632.Nf2Bxe533.Ng4Bxc334.bxc3Kf835.Kf2Rh836.Ne5Nxe537.Rxe5Be838.g4f639.Re6Bb540.Rde1Rc70–1
Subsequently the temptation increases to try also such kind of moves like g5 which are anti-positional. If a world-champion doesn't succeed to counter the aggression then somebody with much less talent will neither be able to do. Practice however shows often a very different picture.
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
Move
N
Result
Elo
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Please, wait...
24...g5?!(You can only play these kind of moves in thematic openings like the kings indian, in very concrete positions or the endgame. Here it is not good although we must add that blacks position is already bad so it does make some sense to complicate.)24...h5!25.Rb8(Black can answer h3 with Re2.)Rxb826.Bxb8Qg427.h3Nxf3+28.Qxf3Qxc4(Of course white is better but the win is not trivial at all.)25.Rb8Rxb826.Bxb8Qc826...Qg427.h3Nxf3+28.Qxf3+-(The negative consequences of g5 become already visible as the bishop hangs.)27.Nxd4Qxb828.Nf5(G5 also weakened the white squares on the kingside of which white easily profits.)Qf429.Ne3Bd430.Qd3Bc531.g3Qe532.Kg2Qb233.Qe4Kf834.g4Qa235.d6Bxe336.Qxe3Qxc437.Qe7+Kg738.Qxg5+Kf839.Qe7+Kg740.h3Qxa441.d7Qc6+42.Kg3Qc3+43.Kh4Qf344.Qg5+1–0
Blacks position was already awkward so there were mitigating factors to go all in. Often the best move only delays defeat with a number of moves and there are no points to win with the number of moves. An objectively inferior move can sometimes create sufficient complications in such situations to change the course of the game. Here it failed and only a desperate endgame remains.
I often experienced to my shame that anti-positional moves like g5 are very risky. I still remember very well how I self-destructed a complex position against Geert Vanderstricht by playing twice on a row the extremely stupid g5.
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
Move
N
Result
Elo
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Please, wait...
26...g5?(In the Dutch, g5 is rather normal but it is always a matter of carefully weighting pros and cons. Here I want to chase away the knight with g5 which is clearly a too optimistic idea. A waiting move like Rd7 is unpleasant but much better.) 27.hxg6hxg628.Bf1?(White sets a trap. However much stronger was Bxe4 creating big problems for black.)g5?(Consistent but I fall with open eyes for the trap. Kh7 or Qb6 were playable.)29.Nxd5Bxd5?!(Timetrouble, shock? In any case blacks counterattack is fantasy. The cool Kh7 still puts up a fight.)30.Rxd5Qxd531.Bc4Qxc432.bxc4Rd233.Qe5(The black king is an easy target. No surprise that Geert only needs a couple of extra moves to finish the game.)Rf834.Rb1Nxf235.Rb7Nh3+36.Kf1Rf2+37.Ke11–0
G5 is a standard-move in the Dutch stonewall to initiate a kings-attack but in above example this was of course extremely optimistic. I can even add based on my decades of experience with the Dutch that g5 is always something delicate contrary to example the Kings Indian.
Replaying contemporary games of topplayers is definitely not the way to learn the basics of chess. In the article Knights On the Rim Are Amazingthe Amercian grandmaster Daniel Naroditsky warns the reader that successfully breaking the rules fully depends on the strength of a player. Therefore it is surely not redundant to first understand and implement the basic principles. This can be much easier learned by grabbing a book which annotates the games of old masters like Capablanca, Rubinstein,....
Brabo
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.