When I was still playing e4, I was striving for a complete repertoire. I tried to have prepared an answer for each black move in the opening. After the switch to 1.d4 I didn't manage anymore. It was and is too much. Because of that I chose a more experimental approach. I knew more or less the mainlines but the more subtle and not so subtle details would be investigated in the games. Of course this was risky. More than once I had with white! after 10, 12 moves a worse position and had to work hard for weeks even months to get a half point out of the game. Admittedly , those were very instructive experiences. But such was not the purpose. For a good result it is necessary to create with white winning chances.
So I bought the necessary books, of which a few repertoire-books. The pros and cons are known. I don't want to discuss this here. This time I want to tell about a recommendation which I don't really know how to judge properly. The recommendation is from GM Schandorff. His two books got good reviews and I must confess that he understands more about chess than I. It concerns the Old-Indian opening.
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
Move
N
Result
Elo
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Please, wait...
1.d4d62.c4(In fact I intended e4. But I had a faint suspicion that black would like to play the Lion - very popular in the Netherlands - and I was not in the mood for it.)Nf63.Nc3e54.d5(The best move is probably Nf3. But just like Schandorff’s books I have neither the classic Kings-Indian opening neither the Counter-fianchetto on my repertoire. Therefore I was curious if a setup a la Sämisch was worth consideration. As a repertoire-book should be, Schandorff is very optimistic. A serious dose of skepticism seems to me wise.)Nbd75.e4Nc56.f3a57.Be3Be78.Qd20-09.0-0-0h69...a410.Kb1a311.b3(The comment of Schandorff is characteristic for a repertoire-book: "the queenside is closed and you must ask - who has the better prospects on the kingside? White, of course!" Just like chess is so easy..... )10.Kb1(If this move is necessary then any optimism should calm down.)10.g4Nh711.Kb1(White yet has nothing better.)10...a410...Nh711.g4Bh4(To be honest I have to mention that Schandorff only claims a minimal advantage of space for white. But I believe that the chosen route by my opponent is also worth investigating. My next move indicated there is more ongoing than simple throwing the g-pawn and h-pawn forward.)11.g311.g4Nh712.h4Bxh413.Bxh6Bg514.Bxg5Nxg515.Qh2f6(and the white attack is not much, because the Ng1 and the bad Bf1 are not active. I have a lot of experience with the Argentinian attack against the Pirc (same setup for white, but with a pawn on c2). An excellent example is Ree-Donner, NEDch 1967. White could not break through exactly for these reasons.)11.h4Nh512.Nge2f5 (is also not what white wants.)11...Nfd711...Nh712.h4f513.Bxc5dxc514.exf5Bxf5+15.Bd3(and white maybe is a bit better.)12.h4c613.g4Re813...Bxh414.Bxh6(Now this is good for white.)14.Nh314.h5f615.Nge2Qa516.Ng3(Rybka is impressed but I am not. How can white breakthrough? On chesspub there was a discussion about this type of positions. It was rightly stated that white is much better if he plays Nf5 and proceeds with pushing c4-c5. But in my exact case this is impossible. This strengthens my skepticism.)14...Qa515.g5h516.Be2(Preferably I wanted to play f3-f4, moreover the only way to still achieve something. Then I can again use my kings-bishop. And that is surely a headache which Schandorff does not pay attention to. Again the Argentinian attack learned me that it is important to first activate all the pieces if an immediate storm does not give any dividends.)g617.Nf2(If I play f3-f4 then I do not want like in the Dragon sometimes happens, to permit a black piece on g4.)Nb618.Rhf1Bf819.f4a320.b3(Unfortunately I pushed a few wrong buttons and lost once again my analysis. I am still not convinced white is better. A few articles of Brabo ago I recommended the Old-Indian opening for black and it seems that I do not have to retract that.)cxd520...exf421.Bd4(Bxc5 is now bad.)Bg7(Looks logical.)21.Bxc5dxc522.exd5exf4 (Black suffers due to a small backlog in development. Therefore maybe better 22...Bg7.)23.Nfe4Bf523...Bg724.Rxf4Be525.Rdf1(I had no objection against this exchange-sacrifice. My more active pieces, the protected passed pawn and the holes in blacks kings-side provide sufficient compensation. If this is winning, is another question. My goal was mainly a sharp battle with chances. )24.Rxf4Re525.Bd3Bg7(As long there are prospects of an attack, there is no need to avoid opposite bishops.)25...Bxe426.Bxe4Bg727.Qc2(and I like my position. The Nb6 is not well positioned)26.Nd6Nc827.Nxf5gxf528.Kc2(Protects Nc3 and guarantees that whites attack will generate an endgame with a pawn extra.)Nd629.Rg1Kf830.g6Qd830...Bh631.Qf2(and white enters.)31.gxf7Qf632.Rf3Re733.Rfg3Rxf734.Rg6Qd434...Qxh435.Rxg7Rxg736.Qh6+-35.Be2Re836.Qxd4Bxd437.Bxh5Bxg138.Rxg1Re339.Bxf7Kxf740.Rh1Kg641.Kd2Rg342.Re1(The e-file is now in whites hands and the black king is cut out of play.)Kf743.h5Rh344.Re6(The h-pawn was beyond salvation. It is nice to exchange the blocking piece.)Ne4+45.Nxe4fxe446.Rxe4Rxh547.Kd3Rh1(I already know it for years, it still surprises me how bad engines handle these positions. Something like this position here I had never before on the board. I was on my own. Somebody having experience with similar positions -so with a strange far advanced pawn on the rim- is warmly invited to react. As mentioned earlier I lost my analyses. However I do remember that I discovered 2 ways to infiltrate with the king: via the right so like in the game, or via the left by means of b3-b4 and king to b3. After my last 2 moves I did not see how black can prevent both threats.)47...Rh248.Re2Rh149.b4cxb450.c5Rb151.Kc4Rb252.Re3Rxa253.Kxb4(Do not shoot if there is a hole as I was busy many hours during the game analyzing this position and I do not want to do that over again.)48.Re6Rd1+48...Rh3+(A devilish trap.)49.Ke4Rxb350.Ke5!Rb251.Kd6Rxa252.Re3+-49.Ke4Rd250.Ke5Rxa251.Kd6Rb252.Re7+Kf653.Rxb7a254.Ra71–0
But what I have to think exactly of the Sämisch against the Old-Indian opening is still not clear to me. Next time I will just try it again.
For the ambitious beginner I can recommend 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f3 (I don't care if this is imprecise) Lg7 5.Le3 O-O 6.Dd2 c6 7.O-O-O to play as I did for years. Without the experience I likely didn't win that game. Therefore I want to end with a light rapid-game, once again against a stronger opponent:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.