tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2493366019305411742.post7918347524483671054..comments2023-09-14T15:09:20.047+02:00Comments on Chess-Brabo: AnnotationsBrabohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06327954944602462820noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2493366019305411742.post-374573346457123302014-01-27T13:12:42.296+01:002014-01-27T13:12:42.296+01:00There is no right or wrong in this discussion. How...There is no right or wrong in this discussion. However if the readers don't understand the author then there is problem.<br />Very likely Axel (as most others) annotate from the sportive point of view which is a perfectly understandable choice as a game is a sportive encounter. Computers are still not able to evaluate the sportive nuances in our game.Brabohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06327954944602462820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2493366019305411742.post-68321696817909952352014-01-27T12:04:44.204+01:002014-01-27T12:04:44.204+01:00Interesting that you let the final evaluation be d...Interesting that you let the final evaluation be done by the computer. A few months ago I read Axel Smith's _Pump Up Your Rating_, and I have to paraphrase from my bad memory here. He also builds large trees of analysis that he later prunes down to shorter variations and explanations in words. He also uses the computer extensively to analyze and follows its lines (as well as his own ideas), Remcohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12551737607019652560noreply@blogger.com